← ~/work/fintech-ai /case_study
Case_Study // [AI][02] shipped — professional work

Sixty payment providers, one checkout.

Integrated, maintained, and scaled 60+ third-party payment provider APIs behind a single e-commerce checkout — transaction processing and fraud handling across multiple regions and regulatory regimes. Employer and client names withheld; specifics available under NDA.

01 // Problem

Every payment provider believes it is the standard. Sixty of them means sixty auth schemes, sixty webhook formats, sixty failure vocabularies, and sixty ideas about idempotency — feeding one checkout that must never double-charge, silently fail, or leak a card number.

The work: make provider count an operational detail. Adding gateway #61 should be routine engineering, not a project.

02 // Decisions

  • Provider adapter contract: each gateway implements one normalized interface (authorize, capture, refund, webhook-verify); quirks live inside the adapter, never in checkout logic.
  • State machine over status strings. Transactions move through explicit states with audited transitions — reconciliation reads the machine, not provider payloads.
  • Idempotency keys everywhere: retries and duplicate webhooks are absorbed, not double-processed.
  • Fraud checks as a pipeline stage ahead of capture, tuned per region.
  • Checkout UX owned end to end (Angular + Ionic mobile): optimization work contributed to a measured 15% conversion-rate increase.

03 // Architecture (sanitized)

checkout (Angular / Ionic)

orders API (.NET)

fraud pipeline

payment orchestrator

transaction state machine — idempotency keys, audit

adapter 01

adapter 02

adapter 03

adapter 60+

payment provider APIs (multi-region)

webhooks

verify

reconcile

04 // Numbers

60+
provider integrations
+15%
conversion-rate lift
multi
regions & regimes
2yr+
owned in production

Volume figures belong to the client. The transferable claim: payment integrations at this count are an architecture problem, not a coding problem — and the adapter/state-machine shape above is what kept #60 as boring as #6.

next case study: LLM gateway→ back to ~/work/fintech-ai